CASE TITLE: SPDC (NIG) LTD v. ELEKI & ORS (2026) LPELR-87106 (CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 2ND OCTOBER, 2026
PRACTICE AREA: LAW OF CONTRACT
LEAD JUDGMENT: MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM SIRAJO, J.C.A.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
INTRODUCTION:
This appeal borders on Contract.
FACTS:
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Rivers State, Port Harcourt Judicial Division.
By a writ of summons, the 1st-4th respondents brought an action against the appellant for the enforcement of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMOU) between the Shell Petroleum Development Company and Kula Kingdom and the Kula Cluster, amongst others. By another order of Court, the 5th and 6th respondents were joined as claimants, whereas the 7th respondent was joined as the 2nd defendant. Upon service of the amended Writ of Summons alongside other processes, the 1st defendant, now appellant, filed its Amended Statement of Defence and the claimants, now 1st-4th respondents, filed their Amended Reply to the Amended Statement of Defence. Upon consideration of the action before it, the Trial Court entered its judgment in favour of the respondent.
Dissatisfied with the decision of the Trial Court, the appellant filed this appeal to the Court of Appeal.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:
The appeal was determined on the following issues:
1. Whether the lower Court was right to direct the Appellant to release to the accredited representatives of Kula Kingdom and its Cluster Communities the balance of the sum of N1,360,112,429.00 contained in Exhibit A.
2 Whether the lower Court was right in directing the parties to commence negotiation and signing of a new Global Memorandum of Understanding within two weeks of the delivery of the judgment.
DECISION/HELD:
The appeal was dismissed.
RATIOS:
- ACTION- CLAIM(S)/RELIEF(S): Whether the Court can grant a relief not claimed
- CONTRACT- ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT: Position of the law where there is a pre-existing contractual obligation and a subsequent statute; whether a pre-existing obligation to negotiate with oil-producing host communities must comply with Chapter 3 of the Petroleum Industry Act
- CONTRACT- ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT: Whether a party who has prayed the Court for the enforcement of a contract can later pray the Court to disregard the same
- CONTRACT- ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT: Whether a Court can enforce parties to participate in a contract that they have not consented to
- CONTRACT- ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT: Duty of Court in enforcing an existing compromise
- JUDGMENT AND ORDER- SETTLEMENT: Effect of Settlement/compromise agreement
- JUDGMENT AND ORDER- SETTLEMENT: Distinction between a compromise agreement and a consent judgment
To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol
