Categories: STK Café

PUBLIC NOTICE ON VERIFICATION/VALIDATION OF MD METERING EXERCISE

The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) in line with its mandate of protecting the rights of customers has, on the 7th of June, 2017 issued a public notice on verification/validation of MD metering exercise. In the public notice, the Commission explained that this public notice is a sequel to its directive earlier issued to distribution companies (DISCOs) in June 2016 that all MD customers must be metered by 30 November 2016, which deadline was later extended to March 2017 after the Commission received several appeals from distribution companies for extension of time on compliance deadline. The new deadline having now passed, the Commission has issued a sanction on all defaulting DISCOs.

The public notice has directed that any MD customer that was not metered by 1 March 2017 should desist from paying any electricity bill presented by a distribution company on the basis of estimated billing methodology.

The Notice went further to state that no distribution company shall disconnect any MD customer that was not metered by 1 March 2017 on the basis of the customer’s refusal to pay bills issued on the basis of estimated billing methodology after the compliance deadline.

The Commission further charged all MD customers that have not been metered to report the defaulting (DISCOs) to the Commission directly.

However, the issuance of this Public Notice has been trailed by a popular misconception that the directive is in respect of every customer.

This is not so! The Notice was only in respect of Maximum Demand (MD) meters and Maximum Demand (MD) meters are explained by the Notice to be the “meters used by commercial and industrial customers who consume high levels of electricity and contribute substantially to the revenues of distribution companies. The consumption threshold for MD customers is 45KVA.”

Consequently, residential consumers are not included in the directive issued by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC).

Even though this directive has not directly affected the general consumer, it is believed that it is a step in the right direction and we hope that NERC, in carrying out its function, will soon issue a directive in relation to the general public/ residential consumer so that the hardship occasioned by the unavailability of pre-paid meters as well as estimated billings will soon become a thing of the past.

 

lawpavilion

View Comments

Share
Published by
lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Whether it is Enough for a Trial Judge to Say that He Believed a Witness Without Proper Evaluation of the Evidence Before Him

CASE TITLE: AINA v. STATE OF LAGOS (2026) LPELR-83642(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2026 PRACTICE…

5 days ago

Importance of Arraignment and Taking of the Plea of an Accused in a Criminal Trial; Effect of Non-Compliance with the Requirements of a Valid Arraignment

CASE TITLE: ABUBAKAR v. STATE (2026) LPELR-83759(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 28TH APRIL, 2026 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

5 days ago

Whether the Judicial Etc., Officers and Appeal By Prosecutors Act 1963 is an Existing/Relevant/Applicable Law in the Nigerian Legal System

CASE TITLE: C.O.P. v. ONU (2026) LPELR-83904(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 8TH MAY, 2026 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL…

5 days ago

Can a Whistleblower Be Held Responsible for a Police Investigation?

CASE TITLE:  OWIE v. ELAHO & ORS LPELR-83139(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 13TH FEBRUARY, 2026 JUSTICES: YUSUF…

5 days ago

Can an Employee of a Subsidiary Validly Testify for the Parent Company?

CASE TITLE: FALMA ORGANICS LTD & ANOR v. IPCA LABORATORIES LTD LPELR-83445(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 13TH MARCH,…

2 weeks ago

Whether a Party who Fails to Prove His Pleaded Mode of Acquisition of Title to Land can Have Recourse to Other Pleaded Ways of Proving Title to Land

CASE TITLE: ADEGORIOLU & ORS v. SULE & ANOR (2026) LPELR-83645(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 13TH APRIL,…

2 weeks ago