Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Application of the Public Officers’ Protection Act/Law

CASE TITLE: SHU’AIBU V. C.O.P KANO & ANOR (2022) LPELR-57293(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2022

PRACTICE AREA: LEGISLATION.

LEAD JUDGMENT: ITA GEORGE MBABA, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on limitation of action against public officers.

FACTS:

This appeal is against the decision of the Kano State High Court delivered on 30th July, 2018.

The Appellant’s case was that he was arrested in Jos on 23/12/2009, by the agents of 1st Respondent who were looking for his elder brother. That he was brought to Kano and detained by the 1st Respondent until he was later charged to the Kano State High Court by the 2nd Respondent on 21st November 2011, for receiving stolen property. The Kano State High Court however discharged and acquitted him on 21/12/2017.

​Upon his discharge, Appellant took out a writ of summons to protest his travail in the hands of the Respondents.

Upon service of the process on the Respondents, the 2nd Respondent filed a Preliminary Objection challenging the competence of the suit on the grounds that it disclosed no cause of action against the 2nd Respondents and that it was statute-barred.

After hearing the preliminary objection and considering the evidence and addresses of Counsel, the trial judge upheld the preliminary objection, held that the suit was statute-barred and dismissed it.

Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:

 The appeal was determined upon consideration of the issue thus:

“Was the trial Court right to hold that Appellant’s Suit was caught by the limitation law, and dismissed it?”

DECISION/HELD:

In the final analysis, the appeal succeeded and was allowed. The decision of the trial Court was set aside and the suit was sent back to the Chief Judge of Kano State for reassignment to another Judge other than the trial Judge.

RATIOS:

  • ACTION – STATUTE BARRED ACTION: How to determine whether an action is statute-barred
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Statutory Provisions as regards limitation period for bringing an action against a Public Officer
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Instances when the Public Officers Protection Act will not apply

lawpavilion

Share
Published by
lawpavilion

Recent Posts

The Regulatory Earthquake: CBN’s New Rules for Agent Banking

INTRODUCTION The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) released the "Guidelines for the Operations of Agent…

7 days ago

Can Someone Else Swear It?

CASE TITLE:  OHEN & ANOR v. IBRAHIM & ORS LPELR-83250(CA)                            JUDGMENT DATE:  24TH FEBRUARY, 2026…

7 days ago

Does The Filing of a Separate Action Instead of a Counter-Claim by a Defendant Amount to Abuse of Court Process?

CASE TITLE: OLAIFA & ORS v. OLANIYAN & ORS (2026) LPELR-83476(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 31ST MARCH,…

7 days ago

Can the Court at the Pre-Trial Stage Make Appropriate Decisions with Regards to Admission of Fact?

CASE TITLE: BANKOLE & ORS V. OKWARA & ORS (2026) LPELR-83379(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 18TH MARCH,…

7 days ago

Whether a Court can Convict a Defendant for a Lesser Offence when it has no Jurisdiction Over the Original Offence in the Existing Charge

CASE TITLE: SUNDAY v. STATE (2026) LPELR-83357(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 6TH MARCH, 2026 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL…

7 days ago

How Judges Decide Maintenance in Divorce Cases?

CASE TITLE: OMOJAFOR v. OMOJAFOR LPELR-83400(CA)                                           JUDGMENT DATE: 23RD MARCH, 2026 JUSTICES: TUNDE OYEBANJI AWOTOYE,…

2 weeks ago